Political parties are indispensable associations for the representations of various political ideologies. They protect fundamental of human rights and opportunities in the fair frameworks of our time. By sorting out themselves into political parties, assorted ethnic, religious, social groups and minorities have the opportunity to make their voices found out about the political procedures in a nation. That is the reason securing the presence and privileges of political gatherings is key for safeguarding the sound working of any popular government. In numerous nations, laws and control represent the standards to be connected to political parties. While in created popularity based frameworks such laws shield the parties and political groups from the mistreatment of governments and state powers, in immature nations, these laws restrain the opportunities of political parties and keep up a high boundary in the activity of political rights. Ethnic politics issues also include complicated decisions running from the utilization of brutality to incorporation in administration. Pioneers of an ethnic development may shape political parties, take an interest in decisions and agent establishments, utilize viciousness, or use a blend of these methods toward the accomplishment of ethnic interests. Turkey has had a wavering record of democratization and an unpredictable civil war over the most recent thirty years. One of the longest ethnic rebellions, as of late heightening amidst Syrian war, between Partiya Karkerân Kurdistan (PKK) and the Turkish state, gives novel chances to understanding the cooperative energies between ethnic clash and governmental issues of portrayal. The political wing of Kurdish ethnopolitical movement has remained exceedingly dynamic in the Turkish political scene since the 1990s, framing political parties, taking part in elections, and voicing their requests in parliament. In any case, while this cooperation is critical, representative of Kurdish minority works under double imperatives. The main emerges from the strict illustrative style of Turkish patriot tip-top privileging majoritarianism over participatory and deliberative elucidations of popular government. As per this view, agent majority rules system is a procedural diversion that totals singular inclinations into a “general will,” the exemplification of national intrigue. This dynamic thought of general will rejects the possibility of minority portrayal. Subsequently, any representative activities intending to legitimize the outflow of Kurdish personality and propel substantive portrayal of minority interests have been hindered by the state elites through established limitations, legitimate procedures, and non-political means. A. History Of Kurdish Political Parties in Turkey The first Kurdish political party was the People’s Labor Party , had been found on June 7, 1990, by Fehmi Isiklar and nine other Kurdish MPs in Turkey. The HEP joined the Social Democrat Party (SHP) for Turkey’s 1991 general decisions and picked up 22 situates in the Turkish Grand Assembly. In July 1993, the HEP was prohibited by Turkey’s Constitutional Court. Following its dissolution, Kurdish MPs established the Freedom and Democracy Party in May 1993. On November 23, OZDEP was likewise prohibited and was prevailing by the Democracy Party (DEP). In March 1994, the Turkish parliament lifted the resistance of six DEP MPs, including the main Kurdish female MP, Leyla Zana. They were later condemned to 15 years in jail on charges of treachery and association with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). Different individuals got away to Europe and joined the foundation of the Kurdistan Parliament in Exile in Brussels. On June 16, 1994, the DEP was disbanded by the Constitutional Court. With each restricted Kurdish party, a substitute group was shaped. The People’s Democracy Party was established on May 11, 1994, with Murat Bozlak as the chose pioneer. HADEP was the principal Kurdish party to take an interest in the 1995 and 1999 decisions. It didn’t be that as it may, meet the 10 percent required limit and consequently did not win any seats– in spite of the fact that it was overwhelming gathering in the Kurdish district. In the 1999 nearby decisions, it won 37 regions over the Kurdish area, including seven noteworthy Kurdish urban areas. However HADEP’s destiny was the same as its antecedents, and it was banned by the Turkish Constitutional Court on March 13, 2003. Furthermore, 46 of its establishing individuals were restricted from political exercises. Next, the Democratic People’s Party was set up. DEHAP picked up around seven percent of the aggregate votes in Turkey in 2002. In spite of its aggregate votes numbering around three million, which could have meant more than 30 MPs, it didn’t prevail with regards to entering the Turkish parliament. The Constitutional Court opened an argument against the DEHAP, yet the gathering later converged with the Democratic Society Party (DTP) drove by veteran Kurdish government official Ahmet Turk and Aysel Tugluk, one of Ocalan’s legal counsellors. The DTP did not take part in the 2007 races, but rather its applicants ran freely. It secured 22 situates in the Turkish parliament on its first endeavour and was blamed by the Turkish government for being a political wing of the PKK. In the 2009 nearby races, the DTP won mayorships in 100 urban areas and towns in the Kurdish locale. The gathering was restricted by Turkey’s Constitutional Court on December 11, 2009. Moreover, its co-seats, Turk and Tugluk, were stripped of their parliamentary resistance and banned from enrollment in any political gathering for a long time. The Peace and Democracy Party was made in 2008, preceding the DTP was shut, and numerous Kurdish MPs joined. BDP hopefuls ran freely too, and the party secured 36 situates in the Grand National Assembly of Turkey. Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) is the eighth progressive Kurdish political party in Turkey. Its objective was to locate an equitable answer for the Kurdish issue in Turkey through tranquil means so as to secure the essential privileges of the Kurds. The majority of its antecedents were banned by Turkey’s Constitutional Court.