IntroductionTheintroduction provides a part of the paper to the readers with the specificinformation for the given research proposal. The primary function is toestablish a research framework that readers can understand on the givenresearch. In the introduction, the writer should engage in exciting topics thatlay a foundation for the given related problem. The place involved in the studythat suggests larger context and scholarly literature tends to be out of reachfrom specific audiences.
If a researcher is working in a particular framework,the line of inquiry should be discussed and introduced in the literature review(Pajares 2007).Inquantitative studies, the theory is deductively placed towards the beginning ofa plan and research. The approach tends to collect and test the given data andgive a reflection of the opinion confirmed.
The theory tends to become aframework that organizes the model of the hypotheses of the given datacollection procedure (Pajares 2007).Purpose Statement / Statement of theProblem.Thestatement of the problem tends to describe the context of the given study toidentify an analytical approach. The problem defined exists in the theory,literature and practice of a given study. It is essential in a proposal thatthe reader stands out and recognizes poorly formulated discussions andproblems. A problem should be highlighted within a given context, and themeaning should include a theoretical and conceptual framework (Herrington et al2007).
Inqualitative inquiry, the involvement of the theory on the line of theinvestigation depends on the participation of the nature of the given study.Useful problem statements tend to answer various questions such as why is thereneed for research to be conducted. If a researcher cannot answer suchquestions, without focusing on the global proportions the statement of theproblem will become diffuse and ambiguous (Herrington et al 2007).Literature ReviewTheliterature review provides a background of research and context for aparticular problem. It should tend to establish a specific need for the writerto be knowledgeable in a particular sector. The literature review manages toaccomplish various things. It shares with the reader the essential aspects ofextending and gaps in the study. It tends to establish a framework of thedifferent importance of education as well as the benchmarking for findings andresults.
We should avoid statements and imply that there exist little done oncertain aspects which have been to extensive. Committees want various sectionsto allocate a search strategy that uses sources of procedures to investigatethe literature review (Herrington et al 2007).Research Questions and Hypothesis.Questionstend to be relevant to a given type of research.
They tend to be most oftenused in various quantitative inquiry and become more prominent. Hypothesesmanage to be relevant through theoretical study and are always on the quantitativeinvestigations. When a writer hypothesis is entitled to the exposition of agiven theory the assumptions underlying the approach should be grounded in dataand predictions (Pajares 2007).Thepracticing of using various kinds of hypotheses is derived from past scientificmethod that has a particular aspect of social inquiry. Predictions have fourdifferent types of statements, Literary null which means there exists nodifference regarding the theoretical constructs.
There lives no relationshipbetween the academic persistence and support services (Pajares 2007).Aform that states various kind of hypothesis is rejected in multiple theoreticalconstructs. A good example is the more the non-traditional aged women, the morethey persist academically. The null hypothesis used in theory does not suggestthe various relationship under investigations. The null hypothesis that is useddoes not imply multiple relationships between the multiple variables underinvestigations (Pajares 2007).
The Research MethodologyThemethods and procedures of research and activities should be described as detailas possible. The methodological steps answer the questions involved in everyrelated hypothesis. The research tends to be plagued by the presence of variousvariables, and the confounding variables should be reduced to control theestimates that are accounted for processes (Herrington et al 2007).Thevariables we randomize and proposes tends to be the nature of various randomizingunits. We need to be aware of the possible sources of error so as design whatexposes you. One tends not to produce an error-free design, and we shouldanticipate for various sources of error (Herrington et al 2007). Questionnaires interviews or researchtools.Researchproblems involved in behavioral and social sciences are always viewedinvestigated and critically analyzed.
The question tends to imply specificareas and text of a particular research problem. Listing your research view anditem at the end of an introduction helps design a roadmap to various plans andstudy. Integrating this text allows more key narrative of an issue underinvestigation (Pajares 2007).Thecritical reason concerned with the measurement and validity interprets thestudy to the extent that results in certain situations. The area to whichreport findings can be generalized are situations of a review.
To generalizevarious findings situations, people observe these studies. By research toolssuch as sampling probabilities, this is meant for the inclusion of samples invarious elements of a population. Participants tend to include multipleexamples that indicate a sampling plan. The extent and outcome of a study resultto variables that are measured, manipulated and systematically aligned.
Howshould we represent a sample in a given survey population (Pajares 2007)?How are Results measured andAnalyzed?Resultsare measured and determined by the inclusionary and exclusionary decisions wheninvestigating a given problem. We should tend to acknowledge the variousachievements and the approaches that are used to finalize a given topic. Thefirst limiting steps of a result involves related problems that could have beenobserved but were rejected. Many factors focus on the socio-economic factors indelivering high-quality results.
The research questions addressed and theobjectives have variable interests since the theoretical framework andprocedure tends to be adopted in the long run (Pajares 2007). How are the results presented?Theresults tend to be presented by various factors such as the presentation shouldinfluence the research and findings and make many recommendations. The resultshould involve a one-page summary that states the given research questions. Theprimary outcome and themes work well to present the various effects (Pajares2007). References:Pajares, F.
(2007). Elements of a proposal. EmoryUniversity. Herrington, J.
, McKenney, S., Reeves, T., &Oliver, R. (2007). Design-based research and doctoralstudents: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal.